Programmatic TV

For the first time, CTV upfronts beat primetime linear TV

September 30, 2026 · Jeroen Corver

2026 is the year streaming TV money officially beat primetime linear TV money. Analysts project that US upfront commitments for connected TV will top primetime linear for the first time, and total US CTV ad spend will hit roughly $38 billion this year, up about 14%. The money has moved. The plumbing is catching up.

$38B US CTV ad spend this year, up about 14% year over year
CTV upfronts top primetime linear for the first time. Source: eMarketer.

Why the milestone matters

The comparison is upfront versus upfront, the negotiated core of each market, and the scale is what makes it structural: roughly $38 billion this year, up about 14%, about $4.7 billion of new money flowing into streaming in one year. Most of it arrives with programmatic expectations attached: efficiency, measurement, accountability. Buyers want to know where every dollar lands.

What the industry just announced

In late September, a major buying platform expanded its supply-path tool to deal-based buying, not just the open market. The announcement claims coverage across the largest streaming publishers, representing 94% of programmatic demand per the research it cites, with no fee for buyers or sellers to set up or execute a deal.

Supply path cleanup is the discipline of getting your budget to the publisher with as few intermediaries as possible. The two claims doing the heavy lifting are the coverage number and the fee number: near-universal access to where the money flows, and no setup fee, which removes the standard objection to these tools, that the cleanup costs as much as the waste it removes.

Keep your skepticism handy

Two caveats. First, the 94% figure is the vendor's framing of someone else's research, not an independent finding, and the question that matters is whether your inventory lives in that 94% or in the 6% outside it. Second, coverage describes the map, not your specific route: named pipes are not a promise that every one of your deals runs through them. Check your pipes.

Why the plumbing is the margin

The bigger signal is structural: TV dollars are not returning to linear. They are renegotiating how they get to streaming. Fewer hops between your budget and the publisher means less middleman tax and cleaner measurement, and on a $38 billion base, those little cuts add up to real money: every percentage point of supply-chain waste is worth about $380 million industry-wide.

Every hop between your budget and the publisher does two things: it takes a cut, and it degrades the signal, leaving you unsure which households in your actual service area really saw the ad. Frequency capping is the clearest victim. A cap of three exposures per household only works if the system counting the exposures sees all of them. When impressions for the same household flow through multiple paths, each one counts only what it sees, and the cap leaks: the same household sees your ad eight times while your dashboard says three.

The practical move: audit before upfront season locks in

Map the path from your budget to the publisher for your top video buys. If the answer is "we don't know," that is the first finding. Count every hop, price each one, and compare the all-in working budget on your deals against your open-market buys. Pull household-level exposure data where you can and test whether your frequency caps survive the trip. Ask partners which deals get the clean path, and get the answer in writing. A supply path audit in Q4 is leverage; in Q2 it is archaeology.

The counterpoint

Not every intermediary is waste. Some provide real value: aggregated reach across smaller publishers, deal curation, data enrichment, guaranteed delivery terms. The goal is not zero hops. It is known hops, priced hops, and hops that earn their keep.

How many hops does your video budget take before it reaches a publisher?

Data over opinions.

How we can help

We as your partner step in when video money moves and the supply chain needs a check. We trace every hop between your budget and the screen, price each intermediary, and consolidate your buys onto clean paths so more of your spend reaches real customers. We re-weight your video mix between TV and streaming on a real return curve, and we track which households actually saw your ads to prove which ones drove sales.

Frequently asked questions

How do I know if my video ad budget is being wasted?

Audit your video supply path before upfront season locks in. Map the route from your DSP to the publisher: which SSPs, which resellers, which ad servers. Count the hops and their costs, and compare the all-in working-media percentage on your deals against your open-market buys. If the answer is "we don't know," that is the first finding.

Why do my frequency caps keep getting blown?

A cap of three exposures per household only works if the system counting the exposures sees all of them. When impressions for the same household flow through multiple resellers and paths, each one counts what it sees, and the cap leaks. The result is the complaint every media buyer knows: the same household sees your ad eight times while your dashboard says three.

Should I cut out every middleman in my video supply chain?

No. Not every intermediary is waste: some provide real value such as aggregated reach across long-tail publishers, deal curation, data enrichment, or guaranteed delivery terms. The goal is not zero hops. It is known hops, priced hops, and hops that earn their keep. Audit for value, not for hop count alone.

When should I audit my video supply path?

Do it before upfront season, when commitments harden and paths get set for the year. A supply path audit done in Q4 is leverage. The same audit done in Q2 is archaeology. Ask your partners about deal-based supply path optimization on your routes and get the answer in writing, not in a slide.

Sources

Want your video budget reaching more real customers?

We map where your CTV dollars go, cut the wasteful middlemen, and keep more of every dollar working for you.

Contact JC →