For the first time, CTV upfronts beat primetime linear TV
September 30, 2026 · Jeroen Corver
2026 is the year streaming TV money officially beat primetime linear TV money. Analysts project that US upfront commitments for connected TV will top primetime linear for the first time, and total US CTV ad spend will hit roughly $38 billion this year, up about 14%. The money has moved. The plumbing is catching up.
Why the milestone matters
The comparison is upfront versus upfront, the negotiated core of each market, and the scale is what makes it structural: roughly $38 billion this year, up about 14%, about $4.7 billion of new money flowing into streaming in one year. Most of it arrives with programmatic expectations attached: efficiency, measurement, accountability. Buyers want to know where every dollar lands.
What the industry just announced
eMarketer's chart tells the demand story, but the buying story matters more for your budget. As upfront dollars move to streaming, they arrive with programmatic expectations attached: efficiency, measurement, accountability. More of that money is moving into deal-based buying, negotiated directly with publishers instead of won in the open auction. That shift is exactly where waste hides, or gets cut.
Supply path cleanup is the discipline of getting your budget to the publisher with as few intermediaries as possible. With about $4.7 billion in new money flowing into streaming this year, every intermediary takes a position along the way. The question is not whether your CTV buys touch middlemen. It is how many, what each one costs, and what each one does to your signal.
Keep your skepticism handy
One honest note before the audit: a projection is not a receipt. eMarketer's numbers describe where the market is heading, not where your dollars land. The structural shift from linear to streaming is real, but your supply path is still your own problem to solve. Check your pipes.
Why the plumbing is the margin
The bigger signal is structural: TV dollars are not returning to linear. They are renegotiating how they get to streaming. Fewer hops between your budget and the publisher means less middleman tax and cleaner measurement, and on a $38 billion base, those little cuts add up to real money: every percentage point of supply-chain waste is worth about $380 million industry-wide.
Every hop between your budget and the publisher does two things: it takes a cut, and it degrades the signal, leaving you unsure which households in your actual service area really saw the ad. Frequency capping is the clearest victim. A cap of three exposures per household only works if the system counting the exposures sees all of them. When impressions for the same household flow through multiple paths, each one counts only what it sees, and the cap leaks: the same household sees your ad eight times while your dashboard says three.
The practical move: audit before upfront season locks in
Map the path from your budget to the publisher for your top video buys. If the answer is "we don't know," that is the first finding. Count every hop, price each one, and compare the all-in working budget on your deals against your open-market buys. Pull household-level exposure data where you can and test whether your frequency caps survive the trip. Ask partners which deals get the clean path, and get the answer in writing. A supply path audit in Q4 is leverage; in Q2 it is archaeology. Start with where the audience actually is: the CTV Market Usage tool shows streaming behavior by market.
The counterpoint
Not every intermediary is waste. Some provide real value: aggregated reach across smaller publishers, deal curation, data enrichment, guaranteed delivery terms. The goal is not zero hops. It is known hops, priced hops, and hops that earn their keep.
How many hops does your video budget take before it reaches a publisher?
Data over opinions.
How we can help
We as your partner step in when video money moves and the supply chain needs a check. We trace every hop between your budget and the screen, price each intermediary, and consolidate your buys onto clean paths so more of your spend reaches real customers. We re-weight your video mix between TV and streaming on a real return curve, and we track which households actually saw your ads to prove which ones drove sales.
Frequently asked questions
How do I know if my video ad budget is being wasted?
Audit your video supply path before upfront season locks in. Map the route from your DSP to the publisher: which SSPs, which resellers, which ad servers. Count the hops and their costs, and compare the all-in working-media percentage on your deals against your open-market buys. If the answer is "we don't know," that is the first finding.
Why do my frequency caps keep getting blown?
A cap of three exposures per household only works if the system counting the exposures sees all of them. When impressions for the same household flow through multiple resellers and paths, each one counts what it sees, and the cap leaks. The result is the complaint every media buyer knows: the same household sees your ad eight times while your dashboard says three.
Should I cut out every middleman in my video supply chain?
No. Not every intermediary is waste: some provide real value such as aggregated reach across long-tail publishers, deal curation, data enrichment, or guaranteed delivery terms. The goal is not zero hops. It is known hops, priced hops, and hops that earn their keep. Audit for value, not for hop count alone.
When should I audit my video supply path?
Do it before upfront season, when commitments harden and paths get set for the year. A supply path audit done in Q4 is leverage. The same audit done in Q2 is archaeology. Ask your partners about deal-based supply path optimization on your routes and get the answer in writing, not in a slide.
Source
Want your video budget reaching more real customers?
Get one data-backed marketing insight every week. The same no-fluff analysis behind this article, applied to what is actually moving budgets.
Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime.
Connect with Jeroen on LinkedIn